Lieggi NSF award 2347360 (web)
Citation
U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). “Beginnings: An Experiential On-ramp to Strengthen and Diversify the Open Source Workforce.” Award 2347360, award date July 9, 2024. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2347360. Copy: raw/web/2026-11-06 Lieggi NSF award 2347360 (web).md (original: .html beside it). Record read from the NSF awards API, https://api.nsf.gov/services/v1/awards.json. Read 2026-11-06.
Bottom line
- Stephanie C. Lieggi is a co-principal investigator (co-PI) of NSF award 2347360, Beginnings, at UC Santa Cruz. Emily Lovell is the PI.
- The award is $999,924, from July 15, 2024 to June 30, 2028. It funds an experiential learning program in open source for undergraduates from historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).
Background
The NSF award record for Beginnings, in the NSF Experiential Learning for Emerging and Novel Technologies (ExLENT) program. The award page needs JavaScript, so its copy in raw/web/ has no award data. The data here comes from the NSF awards API record for the same award. This is a profile page. Her entity page lists it; no reading list does.
Key claims
- Title: “Beginnings: An Experiential On-ramp to Strengthen and Diversify the Open Source Workforce”. (record, title)
- PI: “Emily Lovell”. Co-PI: “Stephanie C Lieggi”. (record, pi, coPDPI)
- Recipient: “University of California-Santa Cruz”. Instrument: “Cooperative Agreement”. Program: “ExLENT”. (record)
- Funds: “FY 2024 = $999,924.00”. Start “07/15/2024”, end “06/30/2028”. (record)
- “This project aims to serve the national interest by establishing a successful experiential learning program” (abstract)
- “The researchers have completed a pilot program serving four undergraduates from a single HBCU” (abstract)
- Publication listed: “Contributor Catalyst: A Pilot Program to Support HBCU Undergraduates Contributing to Open Source” (2024), https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10892950. (record, publications)
Evidence and method
The federal award record. The amounts and dates are NSF data. The abstract is the project’s own description.
Limits
- The abstract was read in part.
- The record does not say what part of the work the co-PI leads.