Search Take the survey

↑ ↓ choose a page · Enter searches everything, with exact title matches first · kind:source and other filters work there · Esc closes

← wiki/sources
source
First page of the original document

Newsom SB 1047 veto message 2024-09-29 (web)

Online ↗

type
source
created
2026-11-06
updated
2026-11-06
tags
people, governor, sb-1047
elements
origin
web
tier
primary
citable
yes
url
https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SB-1047-Veto-Message.pdf
rehost
yes

Links to 1 · Referenced by 2

Newsom SB 1047 veto message 2024-09-29 (web)

Citation

Gavin Newsom, Governor of California. Veto message for Senate Bill 1047, to the Members of the California State Senate. Office of the Governor, Sept. 29, 2024. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SB-1047-Veto-Message.pdf. Copy: raw/web/2026-11-06 Newsom SB 1047 veto message 2024-09-29 (web).md (original: .pdf beside it), fetched 2026-11-06. Read 2026-11-06.

Bottom line

  • On Sept. 29, 2024, the Governor returned SB 1047 to the Senate without his signature.
  • He says the bill set its threshold by model cost and size, and not by the risk of how a system is deployed.

Background

The Governor’s letter to the Members of the California State Senate. It gives his reasons for the veto of SB 1047. This is a profile page. His entity page lists it; no reading list does.

Key claims

  • “I am returning Senate Bill 1047 without my signature.” (paragraph 1)
  • “California is home to 32 of the world’s 50 leading AI companies” (paragraph 3)
  • “By focusing only on the most expensive and large-scale models, SB 1047 establishes a regulatory framework that could give the public a false sense of security about controlling this fast-moving technology.” (page 2)
  • “While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data.” (page 2)
  • “A California-only approach may well be warranted - especially absent federal action by Congress - but it must be based on empirical evidence and science.” (page 2)

Evidence and method

A signed veto message. It gives the Governor’s reasons. It gives no data.

Limits

It does not describe the CalCompute provisions of SB 1047. The Markdown copy comes from the PDF text layer. Some words have extra spaces; the PDF is the authority.

Suggest a change to this page

Source file: wiki/sources/Newsom SB 1047 veto message 2024-09-29 (web).md, updated 2026-11-06.

Suggest or correct

Know a report, dataset or law that belongs here? Found something wrong? Have a question the sources could answer? A consortium member reads every suggestion and decides. Nothing changes until a person makes the change, and the Suggestions page shows what happened to it.

About you (optional)

Your name and email stay with the team; we use the email only to reply. Your institution may appear on the contributors board.